|
The following hierarchy is used to classify financial instruments for fair value measurement purposes:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices)
Level 3 – Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a level 3 measurement.
Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:
- the fair value of the equity investments measured at fair value through profit and loss are determined based on a valuation of the net asset value attributable to the investments;
- the fair value of the short-term loan receivable is determined with reference to the market-related borrowing rate; and
- the fair value of the remaining financial instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis and price earnings (PE) ratios.
The assets disclosed below have been classified as level 3 financial instruments, i.e. the inputs are not based on observable market data. The carrying amount of all assets in the table below approximates the fair value of the assets.
Group fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3): |