| RECOGNISED FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following hierarchy is used to classify financial and non-financial instruments for fair value measurement purposes:
| Level 1 – |
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| Level 2 – |
Inputs other than quoted prices included within level that are observable for the asset or liability either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices). |
| Level 3 – |
Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). |
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a Level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following table presents the groups assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at 30 June 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment in Jasco (note 9.11) |
37 182 |
– |
– |
37 182 |
– |
– |
|
| Investment in collective schemes |
268 173 |
|
|
268 173 |
|
|
|
| Investment in AAR (note 9.5) |
– |
– |
18 444 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| Contingent consideration (note 36) |
– |
– |
134 893 |
– |
– |
134 893 |
|
| Investment Property (note 7) |
– |
– |
15 000 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| |
305 355 |
– |
168 337 |
305 355 |
– |
134 893 |
|
| 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment in Jasco (note 9.11) |
24 788 |
– |
– |
24 788 |
– |
– |
|
| Investment in AAR (note 9.5) |
– |
– |
18 444 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| Investment Property (note 7) |
– |
– |
15 000 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| |
24 788 |
– |
33 444 |
24 788 |
– |
– |
|
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial and non-financial instruments include:
| • |
the use of quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments. The Jasco Electronics Holdings Limited and the collective investment schemes share price was obtained from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) |
| • |
the fair value of the remaining financial instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis and PE ratios. |
| • |
The fair value of the investment property is determined using current prices in an active market for similar property |
The assets disclosed above have been classified as a Level 3 financial and non-financial instruments i.e. the inputs are not based on observable market data except for the investment in, Jasco Electronics Holdings Limited, which is classified as a Level 1 financial instrument (non-current asset held for sale). The carrying amount of all assets in the table above approximates the fair value of the assets.
Group fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
| Opening balance |
– |
18 444 |
15 000 |
|
| Additions |
134 893 |
– |
– |
|
| Transaction costs |
– |
– |
– |
|
| Closing balance |
134 893 |
18 444 |
15 0 |
|
INVESTMENT IN AAR
The fair value of the investment in AAR Insurance Holdings is derived by valuation techniques using the most recent financial information available to AfroCentric Investment Corporation Limited. Management are satisfied that valuation of the investment in the AAR represents the fair value.
INVESTMENT PROPERTY
The fair value of the investment property is derived by an external property valuer using current prices in an active market for similar property in the same location and condition. In applying this approach the valuer has selected other properties that have similar risk, growth and cash-generating profiles. Management reviews the valuation performed by the external valuer and is satisfied that the inputs used by the external property valuer are reasonable.
CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
Discounted cash flow method was used to capture the present value of the expected future economic benefits that will flow out of the Company arising from the contingent consideration. Under the contingent consideration arrangement, AfroCentric Investment Corporation Limited is required to issue Glen Eden Trading 58 (Proprietary) Limited an additional 26 192 902 shares based on management’s best estimate as per the Acquisition of shares agreement. R134.9 million is the estimated fair value of this obligation at year-end.
The following table summarises the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in level 3 fair value measurements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment in AAR
(unlisted investment) |
18 444 |
|
Price earnings ratio |
11.32 |
|
If a P/E ratio of 10.32 were used
the investment in AAR would
increase by R1.762 million in other
comprehensive income.
If a P/E ratio of 12.32 were used
the investment in AAR would
increase by R1.748 million in other
comprehensive income. |
|
| Investment Property |
15 000 |
|
Price per square
meter |
R1 500 per
square meter |
|
The higher the price per square
meter the higher the fair value. |
|
| Contingent
consideration |
134 893 |
|
Average growth rate |
5% |
|
If an average growth rate of 4% were
used the contingent consideration
would decrease by R2.596 million in
profit and loss.
If an average growth rate of 6% were
used the contingent consideration
would increase by R2.630 million in
profit and loss. |
|
| |
|
|
Expected cash
inflows |
R21.8m–R24.2m |
|
If expected cash flows were 10%
higher or lower, the fair value would
increase/decrease by R13.489m. |
|
VALUATION PROCESS
The finance department of the Group performs the valuations of the investments for financial reporting purposes, including level 3 fair values (excluding the investment property). The team reports directly to the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Discussions of the valuation processes and results are held between the CFO and the Group Finance department at least once every six months, in line with the Group’s bi-annual reporting periods.
The following table reflects the impact on the statement of comprehensive income and other comprehensive income should the fair value increase or decrease by 10%.
|
|
|
|
| Investment in Jasco |
1 239 |
(1 239) |
|
| Contingent consideration |
13 489 |
(13 489) |
|
| Investment in AAR Insurance Holdings |
1 844 |
(1 844) |
|
| Investment Property |
1 500 |
(1 500) |
|
| |
18 072 |
(18 072) |
|
|