Recognised fair value measurements
Fair value hierarchy
The following hierarchy is used to classify financial and non-financial instruments for fair value measurement purposes:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within level that are observable for the asset or liability either directly
(that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices).
Level 3 – Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the
basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The significance of an input is
assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require
significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a Level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance
of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset
or liability.
The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at 30 June 2017:
| |
|
|
| |
Note |
|
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
|
| 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment in Jasco |
9.9 |
|
36 296 |
– |
– |
36 296 |
– |
– |
|
| Collective share investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| schemes |
9.9 |
|
– |
327 719 |
– |
– |
327 719 |
– |
|
| Investment in AAR |
9.4 |
|
– |
– |
18 444 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| Contingent consideration |
34 |
|
– |
– |
(194 475) |
– |
– |
(194 475) |
|
| Investment property |
7 |
|
– |
– |
15 418 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| |
|
|
36 296 |
327 719 |
(160 613) |
36 296 |
327 719 |
(194 475) |
|
|
|
|
| 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment in Jasco |
9.9 |
|
37 182 |
– |
– |
37 182 |
– |
– |
|
| Collective share investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| schemes* |
9.9 |
|
– |
268 173 |
– |
– |
268 173 |
– |
|
| Investment in AAR |
9.4 |
|
– |
– |
18 444 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| Contingent consideration |
34 |
|
– |
– |
(134 893) |
– |
– |
(134 893) |
|
| Investment property |
7 |
|
– |
– |
15 000 |
– |
– |
– |
|
| |
|
|
37 182 |
286 173 |
(101 449) |
37 182 |
268 173 |
(134 893) |
|
* The investment in collective schemes has been moved into Level 2 as it is not listed on the JSE.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial and non-financial instruments include:
- the use of quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments (the Jasco Electronics share price was obtained
from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE));
- the fair value of the collective schemes which is determined using the current unit price of underlying unitised asset,
multiplied by the number of units held;
- the fair value of the remaining financial instruments which is determined using discounted cash flow analysis and PE
ratios; and
- the fair value of the investment property which is determined by using the comparable sales method.
The assets disclosed above have been classified as Level 3 financial and non-financial instruments, i.e. the inputs are not
based on observable market data except for the investment in Jasco Electronics, which is classified as a Level 1 financial
instrument. The carrying amount of all assets in the table above approximates the fair value of the assets.
Group fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
| |
Contingent
consideration
R’000 |
Investment
in AAR
R’000 |
Investment
property
R’000 |
|
| Opening balance |
134 893 |
18 444 |
15 000 |
|
| Additions |
59 582 |
– |
418 |
|
| Closing balance |
194 475 |
18 444 |
15 418 |
|
Valuation inputs and relationships to fair value
Investment in AAR
The fair value of the investment in AAR Insurance Holdings is derived by valuation techniques (price earnings ratio) using the
most recent financial information available to AfroCentric Investment Corporation Limited. Management is satisfied that
valuation of the investment in the AAR represents the fair value.
Investment property
The fair value of the investment property is derived by an external property valuer using the comparable sales method.
In applying this approach the valuer has selected other properties that have similar risk, growth and cash-generating profiles.
Management reviews the valuation performed by the external valuer and is satisfied that the inputs used by the external
property valuer are reasonable.
Contingent consideration
The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined by the ACT share price at year-end, multiplied by the number of
shares to be issued. The number of shares to be issued is stipulated in the shareholders agreement which is derived from the
actual profits generated from Glen Eden. Under the contingent consideration arrangement, AfroCentric Investment Corporation
Limited is required to issue WAD Holdings Proprietary Limited an additional 31 366 977 shares (2016: 26 192 902 shares)
based on the above. R194.5 million (2016: R134.9 million) is the estimated fair value of this obligation at year-end.
The following table summarises the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair
value measurements.
| Description |
|
Unobservable
inputs |
Input value
used |
|
Sensitivity of unobservable inputs on
profit and loss |
|
| Investment in AAR
(unlisted investment) |
18 444 |
|
|
Price earnings
ratio |
8.71 |
|
If a price earnings ratio of 7.71 was used,
the investment in AAR would decrease by
R2.141 million in other comprehensive income. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a price earnings ratio of 9.71 was used,
the investment in AAR would increase by
R2.141 million in other comprehensive income. |
|
| Investment property |
15 418 |
|
|
Price per
square metre |
R1 542
per square metre |
|
The higher the price per square metre, the
higher the fair value. |
|
| Contingent
consideration |
194 475 |
|
|
Price per share |
R6.20 |
|
If the share price increased by 10% the
contingent consideration would decrease by
R19.4 million in profit and loss. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the share price decreased by 10% the
contingent consideration would increase by
R19.4 million in profit and loss. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation process
The finance department of the Group performs the valuations of the investments for financial reporting purposes, including
Level 3 fair values (excluding the investment property). The team reports directly to the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”).
Discussions of the valuation processes and results are held between the CFO and the Group Finance department at least
once every six months, in line with the Group’s bi-annual reporting periods. |