Currently viewing: Corporate Governance / Next: King III Gap Analysis
Corporate Governance
Approach to Governance
Philosophy
AfroCentric Investment Corporation Limited (“AfroCentric”) is a diversified, investment holding group that is committed to sound corporate governance and compliance with regulations and governance principles.
Corporate governance guides the Directors, management and operations of the Group to instil a culture of responsibility, accountability, integrity, ethics and respect.
Responsibility
The Board of Directors is at all times aware of the importance of sound corporate governance and the correlation between sound corporate governance and profitability.
The Board is of the opinion that the Group complied in all material respects with the provisions of the King Code of Governance Principles (“King III”), the Companies Act and the corporate governance provisions in the JSE Listings Requirements during the year under review and where full compliance has not been achieved, these have been disclosed in this report as required.
Governance events during the period
Board of Directors: The Board has appointed Garth
Napier as the Lead Independent Non-Executive Director of
AfroCentric Investment Corporation Limited in accordance
with the King III Code of Good Corporate Governance. Garth
is available to shareholders who have concerns that cannot
be addressed through the Chairman. As Lead Independent
Director, he also provides a sounding board for the Chairman
and serves as an intermediary for other Directors if
necessary.
Company Secretary: Wilbert Mhlanga has been appointed
as the Company Secretary for AfroCentric Investment
Corporation Limited with effect from 1 March 2014.
Audit Committee: During the year under review, a formalised
Audit Committee Charter was reviewed and was approved
by the Audit Committee.
The Board
Board of Directors
The Directors aim to be transparent, impartial and
independent when performing the duties of a Director.
The Board’s roles and responsibilities are formally
documented in its Charter. The AfroCentric Board Charter is
aligned to the key principles of King III, the Companies Act,
2008 and the revised Memorandum of Incorporation (“MOI”)
of the Company.
Operational responsibility for the Group’s subsidiary
companies has been delegated to the individual Boards
which are accountable for the ongoing management of
those businesses.
The Board exercises leadership and judgement in directing
the Group to achieve sustainable growth and to act in the
best interest of the Group and its stakeholders. The Board
Charter clearly sets out the Board’s objectives, role and
composition, and defines practices relating to leadership,
induction, remuneration, meetings, share dealings,
communication, internal audit, code of ethics as well as
evaluation and performance.
Board Charter
A formal Board Charter defines the roles and responsibilities
as follows:
| • |
The Board’s composition and procedures for appointments
of Directors |
| • |
The balance of powers |
| • |
The roles and responsibilities of the Board |
| • |
The committees of the Board |
| • |
Relationship with stakeholders |
| • |
Performance of the Board |
| • |
Administration of Board proceedings |
Board composition
The Board consists of 10 Directors with a split between two
Executive salaried Directors and eight Non-Executives. Of
the eight Non-Executives, two are independent. The Board
has appointed Mr Garth Napier as the Lead Independent
Non-Executive Director on 2 July 2014.
The recommendation in terms of King III and the JSE
Listings Requirements is that the majority of Non-Executive
Directors be independent and therefore the Board is
partially compliant. Due to majority of Directors being
Non-Executive Directors measures are in place to increase
the number of Independent Non-Executive Directors to
be aligned to the governance requirements. The Board
has therefore undertaken additional steps by appointing a
Lead Independent Non-Executive Director as the current
Chairman is a Non-Executive Director. The Board is satisfied
that each Non-Executive Director plays a key role in the
functioning of the Group and has highly sought after insight
of the industry in which the Group trades. On this basis,
the Board is of the opinion that the collective knowledge,
expertise and experience of these Non-Executive Directors
is in the best interest of all stakeholders and that the Non-
Executive Directors have the necessary skills and expertise to
act in an independent manner that is in the best interests of
the Company.
Each Director plays a key role in the functioning of the Group
and has highly sought after experience and knowledge of the
industry in which AfroCentric trades. The Directors provide
the objectivity and a range of skills and experience necessary
for the Board to function effectively.
Risk and Transformation Committees don’t operate at
the Company level. The Board instead relies on the sub-Committees of AfroCentric Health Limited (“AHL”), the
majority subsidiary with a 94.1% shareholding, and entrusts
them to function and operate as intended whilst updating
the Board as to any material matters.
| AfroCentric Committees |
AHL Committees |
| (Company) |
(Subsidiary) |
| Audit |
Risk |
| Remuneration and Nominations |
Transformation |
| Investment |
|
| Social and Ethics |
|
As required by King III and the JSE Listings Requirements,
the roles of the Chairperson and CEO are separate and
clearly defined.
The Chairperson is a Non-Executive Director but is not
independent as recommended by King III and the JSE
Listings Requirements. A Lead Independent Non-Executive Director has been appointed in compliance with King III and
the JSE Listings Requirements. The Board is of the opinion
that the Chairperson has the necessary experience and
expertise to act in an independent manner that is in the best
interest of the Company. The Chairperson has a clear division
of her role and responsibilities.
| Director |
Designation |
Appointment date |
| AT Mokgokong (Chairperson) |
Non-Executive Director |
10 June 2010 |
| MI Sacks |
Non-Executive Director |
20 December 2005 |
| NB Bam |
Non-Executive Director |
20 December 2005 |
| JM Kahn |
Non-Executive Director |
20 December 2005 |
| MJ Madungandaba |
Non-Executive Director |
10 June 2010 |
| WRC Holmes |
Executive Director |
23 June 2010 |
| Y Masithela |
Independent Non-Executive Director |
1 September 2011 |
| G Napier |
Independent Non-Executive Director |
1 September 2011 |
| D Dempers |
Executive Director |
5 September 2011 |
| JG Appelgryn |
Non-Executive Director |
17 September 2011 |
Demographics
The Board consists of 10 Directors with a split between two
Executive salaried Directors and eight Non-Executives. Of
the eight Non-Executives, two are independent. The Board
has appointed Mr Garth Napier as a Lead Independent Non-Executive Director on 2 July 2014.
| Non-Executive Chairman |
1 |
 |
|
|
|
| Executive Director |
2 |
|
|
|
| Non-Executive Director |
4 |
|
|
|
| Independent Non-Executive Director |
2 |
|
|
|
| Lead Independent Non-Executive Director |
1 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| HDSAs |
4 |
 |
Women |
3 |
 |
| Non-HDSAs |
7 |
Men |
9 |
Directors' Independence
The recommendation in terms of King III and the JSE
Listings Requirements is that the majority of Non-Executive
Directors be independent. Although the Board is only
partially compliant in this regard, the determination is
that each Non-Executive Director plays a key role in the
functioning of the Group and has highly sought after insight
of the industry in which the Group trades. On this basis,
the Board is of the opinion that the collective knowledge,
expertise and experience of these Non-Executive Directors
is in the best interest of all stakeholders and that the Non-
Executive Directors have the necessary skills and expertise
to act in an independent manner that is in the best interests
of the Company.
The Directors provide the objectivity and range of skills and
experience necessary for the Board to function effectively.
As required by King III and the JSE Listings Requirements,
the roles of the Chairperson and CEO are separate and
clearly defined.
The Chairperson is a Non-Executive Director but is not
independent. However, the Board is of the opinion that the
Chairperson has the necessary experience and expertise to
act in an independent manner that is in the best interest of
the Company. The Chairperson has a clear division of her
role and responsibilities.
A Lead Independent Non-Executive Director has recently
been appointed to meet the requirements of both King III
and the JSE Listings requirements.
Responsibilities of the Chairperson
The Chairperson ensures that no single individual has
unfettered powers of decision-making and authority, thus
ensuring that stakeholder interests are protected.
Per the Board Charter, the primary function of the
Chairperson is to preside over meetings and to ensure the
proper functioning of the Board.
In addition the Chairperson has the following
responsibilities:
| • |
Together with the Company Secretary, formulate a
Board work plan with the agreed goals and objectives
as determined by the Board; |
| • |
Oversee the appointment, induction and education of
Directors in accordance with legislative requirements,
best practice standards and Executive performance
management; |
| • |
Oversee the regular evaluation of the performance of
the Board and the Directors; |
| • |
Ensure that all Directors are aware of their fiduciary
responsibilities; |
| • |
Ensure that all relevant information and facts are placed
before the Directors to enable them to make informed
decisions; |
| • |
Together with the Group CEO, maintain relations with
important stakeholders and stakeholders of the Board. |
Board evaluation and performance
AfroCentric undertakes annual Board and Board
Committee evaluations, including individual evaluations of
the Chairperson and each Director, as recommended by
King III.
The Board is of the opinion that the Chairperson has
the necessary experience and expertise to act in an
independent manner that is in the best interests of
the Group.
The Directors are recognised as having unique expertise
and prestigious standing in South African business, and
the Company is confident that its Directors have the
necessary expertise and experience to fulfil their duties and
responsibilities.
The Directors receive training and development,
when required.
The independence of long-serving Non-Executive Directors
is informally assessed on an annual basis by the Board.
The Board concluded that these Directors remain correctly
categorised as independent.
A formal evaluation questionnaire has been developed for
all Directors and is in the process of being implemented, in
order to assess performance and independence, if relevant.
Election and rotation of Directors
Directors are appointed by the Board in a formal and
transparent manner. The Remuneration and Nominations
Committee considers suitable candidates and nominates
persons for appointment as Directors to the Board.
Non-Executive Directors are selected based on their
skills, business experience and qualifications, while gender
and racial diversity are also considered in appointing
new Directors.
An induction programme exists for newly appointed
Directors to familiarise themselves with the Group’s
operations, structure, sustainability and business
environment. The programme also outlines the fiduciary
and statutory duties to be performed by the Director.
One-third of the Directors are required to retire by rotation
at the AGM of shareholders, although they may offer
themselves for re-election. Directors appointed during the
period are required to have their appointments ratified at
the following AGM.
Directors have no fixed term of appointment and no
retirement age has been fixed.
Board meetings
The Board Charter requires the Board to meet no less than
four times a year and additional meetings are convened
when necessary.
All Board meetings are convened by formal notice and
supporting documentation is distributed to all Directors
at least five working days before Board meetings to allow
for adequate preparation, and to facilitate more relevant
discussion at these meetings.
The Board is entitled to execute Board business, where
appropriate, via round robin resolution, to ensure continuity
in the Board's relationship with the Company.
Six Directors constitute a quorum at Board meetings,
provided that a majority of the Directors present are Non-
Executive.
Decisions taken at Board meetings are decided by a
majority of votes, with each Director having one vote.
Directors have full access to all Group information and
are entitled to obtain independent professional advice at
the Group’s expense, after consulting with the Chairman.
Directors also have direct access to management and may
meet with management.
Meeting attendance
| |
|
17 September 2013 |
26 November 2013 |
20 March 2014 |
2 July 2014 |
|
| |
AT Mokgokong (Chairperson) |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
MI Sacks |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
D Dempers |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
 |
|
| |
WRC Homles |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
 |
|
| |
NB Bam |
✔ |
✔ |
 |
✔ |
|
| |
B Joff |
 |
 |
— |
— |
|
| |
JM Kahn |
 |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
MJ Madungandaba |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
Y Masithela |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
G Napier |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
JG Appelgryn |
 |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Conflicts of interests
Directors are required to declare their personal financial
interests, and those of related persons, annually, in terms of
the Companies Act and the MOI.
Directors are required to declare their personal financial
interests, and those of related persons, annually, in terms of
the Companies Act and the MOI.
Based on these declarations, no Directors had a material
interest in any transaction with the Group during the financial
period, other than the interests disclosed in of
the annual financial statements and shareholding as per the
shareholders’ analysis on pages 119 to 120.
Dealings in securities
The Company Secretary annually advises Directors of
the relevant provisions of the Financial Markets Act 19 of
2012 and the JSE Listings Requirements regarding the
prohibitions regarding dealing in the Company’s shares
or encouraging dealing by others, while in possession of
non-public, price-sensitive information, or disclosing this
information.
Directors are prohibited from dealing in the Group’s shares
during two formal closed periods. The closed periods
commence approximately two weeks before the end of the interim (December) and annual (June) financial periods and
end 24 hours after the financial results are disclosed on the
JSE’s news service, SENS.
Restrictions may also be placed on share dealings at
any other time if Directors have access to price-sensitive
information which is not in the public domain.
All share dealings by Directors, Executives, the Company
Secretary and any designated persons in possession of
price-sensitive information, require prior written approval.
In terms of the JSE Listings Requirements, the Company
Secretary is advised of the share dealings by the Directors
and notifies the JSE and the investment community through
SENS within 48 hours of the trade being effected.
Company Secretary
On 3 June 2013 the independent company, Statucor (Pty)
Ltd, was appointed to provide the services of the Company
Secretary and resigned on 28 February 2014.
Wilbert Mhlanga was appointed the Company Secretary on
01 March 2014. Wilbert is a Fellow Member of the Institute of
Chartered Secretaries and Administrators and a Member of
the Institute of Directors.
The Directors have direct access to the Company Secretary,
who provides guidance to the Board as a whole and to
individual Directors with regards to how their responsibilities
should be discharged.
The Company Secretary is responsible for the induction of
new Directors and the ongoing training of all Directors.
Assistance is provided to the Chairman and CEO in setting
the annual Board plan and Board agendas as well as in
formulating governance and Board-related issues.
The Board has performed an assessment, conducted by the
Chairman, and is of the opinion that the Company Secretary
has the required competence, knowledge and experience
to carry out the duties and responsibilities and is suitably
independent of the Board.
Board committees
The AfroCentric Board takes cognisance of the fact that it is
ultimately accountable and responsible for the performance
and affairs of the Group. The Board delegated certain
authorities to the Board Committees in order to manage the
affairs of the Board, but this in no way absolves the Board,
and its Directors, from the obligation to carry out their
fiduciary duties and responsibilities.
All Board Committees operate under written terms of
reference (the Charter) which is approved by the Board. Each
quarter, all committee chairpersons report to the Board,
either with a written report or verbally, on recent committee
activities. Board committees are permitted to receive
independent, professional advice, as and when deemed
necessary. There is full disclosure and transparency from
these committees to the Board.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has an independent role from
management and is accountable directly to the Board
and the members collectively possess the knowledge
and experience necessary to diligently execute their
responsibilities.
The committee comprises two Independent Non-Executive
Directors, one of whom is the Chairperson, and one
Non-Executive Director. The Board will be appointing an
Independent Non-Executive Director to the Audit Committee
in order to fully comply with governance requirements of at
least three Independent Non-Executive Directors.
The Audit Committee Charter outlines the purpose and
responsibilities as:
| • |
Review the interim and year-end financial statements, and
provide a recommendation to the Board regarding such
financial statements; |
| • |
Review the external audit reports and supply guidance
for the use of the external auditor for non-audit services; |
| • |
Review internal audit and risk management functions and
reports with recommendations being made to the Board
when necessary; |
| • |
Receive and deal appropriately with any concerns or
complaints, whether from within or outside the Company,
or on its own initiative, relating to:
 |
the accounting practices and audit functions of the
Company; |
 |
the content and auditing of the Company’s financial
statements; |
 |
the internal financial controls of the Company; or |
 |
any related matter; |
|
| • |
Review the effectiveness of the Group’s systems of
internal control, internal audit and risk management; |
| • |
The committee monitors the following and ensures that:
 |
Financial statements are prepared in accordance
with IFRS; |
 |
Internal financial controls are in place and that
AfroCentric is a going concern and when appropriate
makes recommendations; |
 |
The external auditor is independent, that the audit
fees (including non-audit services) are fair and
reasonable, and nominates the appointment of
an auditor; |
 |
There is an effective risk management process
in place; |
 |
That the Financial Director has the necessary
expertise and experience; and |
 |
AfroCentric is represented on the critical sub-Committees of the Boards of its subsidiaries
and/or associates. |
|
Meeting attendance
The Audit Committee meets on an ad hoc basis as required,
but at least twice a year
| |
|
16 September 2013 |
14 March 2014 |
30 June 2014 |
|
| |
G Napier |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
Y Masithela (Chairperson) |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
MI Sacks |
✔ |
 |
 |
|
| |
JG Appelgryn |
 |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Risk Committee
Through the Risk Committee the Board is able to guide
efforts aimed at meeting risk management expectations and
requirements. Together with the Company’s Risk Manager,
review any and all risks that could have a significant impact
on the Company’s business;
The committee comprises two Independent Non-Executive
Directors, one of whom is the Chairperson, and two
Executive Directors. King III and the Companies Act require
that the Committee comprises majority Independent Non-Executive Directors including the Chairperson. At this time
the Group does not comply with these requirements and
accepts the composition of the committee.
The Risk Committee exists only at the AfroCentric Health
level as this is where the management of risks is required for
the operating activities of the Group. Any significant risks
identified by the AHL Risk Committee are escalated to the
ACT Audit Committee.
The Risk Committee Charter sets out the following duties
and responsibilities:
| • |
Review the Risk Management reports with regards to the
adequacy and overall effectiveness of the Company’s
risk management function and its implementation by
management. Review risk in its widest sense including
the following:
 |
Technology risk; |
 |
Disaster recovery plan; |
 |
Operational risk; |
 |
Prudential risk; |
 |
Reputational risk; |
 |
Competitive risk; |
 |
Legal risk; |
 |
Compliance and control risk; |
 |
Concentration of risk across a portfolio dimensions; |
 |
Asset valuation risk; |
 |
Other appropriate risk to the Company; |
|
| • |
Review adequacy of insurance cover; |
| • |
Review risk identification and measurement
methodologies; |
| • |
Monitor processes and procedures to deal with and review
the disclosure of information to clients; and |
| • |
Formulate criteria for the appointment of a Risk Manager
and terms of reference for the Risk Management
Department. |
The AHL Risk Committee meets on an ad hoc basis as
required, but at least twice a year
| |
|
12 September 2013 |
11 November 2013 |
5 February 2014 |
13 May 2014 |
|
| |
M Mashigo (Chairperson) |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
N Qangule |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
W Holmes |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
 |
|
| |
A Meyer |
✔ |
✔ |
— |
— |
|
Remuneration and Nominations Committee
The Remuneration and Nominations Committee is mandated
with oversight regarding new Board appointments and
developing policy on remuneration.
The committee comprises three Non-Executive Directors,
one of whom is the Chairperson. The composition of the
committee is required to be a majority of Independent
Non-Executive Directors. The Group does not comply with
these requirements and, for the time being, accepts the
composition of the committee.
In terms of its Charter, the committee is tasked with
developing a formal process for reviewing the balance and
effectiveness of the Board, identifying the skills needed,
and those individuals that might provide such skill, in a fair
and thorough manner, thus ensuring that the Board remains
effective and focused.
It is also called upon to develop a policy on Executive
remuneration and for determining the remuneration
packages of individual Directors and senior management.
The committee should have access to independent surveys
and consultants. The financial reward offered by a company
should be sufficient to attract people of the required calibre.
Remuneration
| • |
Agree and develop the Company’s general policy on
Executive and Senior Management and staff remuneration.
This general policy will be advised to shareholders in order
for such shareholders to pass a non-binding advisory vote
on AfroCentric’s annual remuneration policy; |
| • |
Determine specific remuneration packages for Executive
Directors of the Company; |
| • |
Identify the criteria necessary to measure the performance
of Executive Directors in discharging their functions and
responsibilities; |
| • |
Review (at least annually) the terms and conditions of
Executive Directors' service agreements, taking into
account information from comparable companies where
relevant. |
Nominations
| • |
Formulate and adopt a clear, transparent process for the
selection, nomination and appointment of Directors to
the Board; |
| • |
Make recommendations to the Board on the appointment
of new Executive and Non-Executive Directors, including
making recommendations on the composition of the
Board and the balance between Executive and Non-
Executive Directors appointed to the Board; |
| • |
Put in place succession plans, particularly for the
Chairperson and the Chief Executive Officer; |
| • |
Liaise with the Board in relation to the preparation of the
committee’s report to shareholders, as required. |
Additional
| • |
Determine any grants to Executive Directors and other
senior employees made pursuant to the Company’s
executive share scheme(s); |
| • |
To coordinate its activities with the Chairperson of the
Board and the Chief Executive Officer as well as consult
with them in formulating the committee’s remuneration
policy and when determining specific remuneration
packages; |
| • |
To advise the Board on the broad framework and costs of
Executive remuneration; |
| • |
Where appropriate, to consult with other non-executive
Directors; |
| • |
To formulate and recommend a corporate statement of
remuneration philosophy which will be reported in the
Company’s Annual Report. |
Meeting attendance
The Remuneration Committee meets on an ad hoc basis as
required, but at least twice a year.
| |
|
17 September 2013 |
06 February 2014 |
|
| |
MI Sacks |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
JM Kahn (Chairperson) |
 |
 |
|
| |
MJ Madungandaba |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Investment Committee
The committee comprises three Non-Executive Directors,
one of whom is the Chairperson.
The Investment Committee meets on an ad hoc basis as
required. During the year under review the committee held
regular, informal meetings.
The duties and responsibilities of the Investment Committee
include:
| • |
Considering commitments, acquisitions or disposals in
the Group; |
| • |
Considering initial investments in the Group; |
| • |
Considering any other investment above the amount of
R5 million; |
| • |
Performing such other investment-related functions as
may be designated by the Board from time to time; |
| • |
Considering the viability of the capital project and/or
acquisition and/or disposal and the effect it may have on
the Group’s cash flow, as well as whether it will align to
the Group’s overall strategy; and |
| • |
Ensuring that due diligence procedures are followed
when acquiring or disposing of assets. |
No material acquisitions satisfied the investment criteria of
the committee, during the period under review, and thus
none were approved.
The Investment Committee meets on an ad hoc basis as
required, but at least twice a year.
| |
|
10 April 2014 |
28 May 2014 |
|
| |
MI Sacks (Chairperson) |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
MJ Madungandaba |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
JM Kahn |
✔ |
 |
|
Transformation Committee
The Transformation Committee exists only at the
AfroCentric Health level as this is where the management
of transformation and BEE is required for the operating
activities of the Group.
The committee comprises one Independent Non-Executive
Director and eight Executive Directors. The Chairperson is
Y Motsisi, Executive Director, Medscheme Holdings, Branding
and Communication, who has resigned effective 30 June
2014. A new chairperson will be appointed accordingly.
The Transformation Committee is responsible for driving
transformation and BEE compliance across the Group:
| • |
Monitoring and reporting on performance against the
BBBEE scorecard; |
| • |
Identifying any out-of-line situations, identifying the
cause and agreeing on an action plan to remedy the out-of-line situation; |
| • |
Measuring performance against key competitors; |
| • |
Report on implemented initiatives and projects,
progress and whether the initiatives assist in achieving
transformation objectives. |
Social and Ethics Committee
The Social and Ethics Committee is constituted as a
Statutory Committee in terms of the Companies Act and as
approved by the Board.
The committee comprises two Independent Non-Executive
Directors, one of whom is the Chairperson, and one Non-Executive Director.
The Social and Ethics Committee is mandated with:
Monitor the Company’s activities, having regard to relevant
legislation, codes of practice, and with regard to matters
relating to:
| • |
social and economic development, including the Company’s
standing in terms of the goals and purposes of –
 |
the 10 principles set out in the United Nations Global
Compact Principles; |
 |
the OECD recommendations regarding corruption; |
 |
the Employment Equity Act; |
 |
the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act; |
|
| • |
Good corporate citizenship, including the Company's; |
| • |
The promotion of equality, prevention of unfair
discrimination, and reduction of corruption; |
| • |
Contributing to the development of the communities in
which its activities are predominantly conducted; |
| • |
Recording of sponsorships, donations and charitable
giving; |
| • |
Health and public safety, including the impact of the
Company’s activities and of its products or services on
the environment; |
| • |
Consumer relationships, including the Company’s
advertising, public relations and compliance with
consumer protection laws; |
| • |
Labour and employment considerations, including the
Company’s standing in terms of the International Labour
Organisation Protocol on decent work and working
conditions; |
| • |
The Company’s employment relationships, and its
contribution toward the educational development of
its employees; |
| • |
Consulting with the Company’s Social and Ethics
Advisory Panel with respect to any matter within the
mandate of the committee; |
| • |
To report annually to the shareholders at the Company’s
Annual General Meeting on the matters within its
mandate. |
Meeting attendance
| |
|
16 September 2013 |
6 February 2014 |
|
| |
NB Bam |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
Y Masithela |
✔ |
✔ |
|
| |
G Napier (Chairperson) |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Internal Audit
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 1. |
|
2. |
|
3. |
|
4. |
|
5. |
The Internal Audit function is governed by an Internal Audit Charter which is approved by the AfroCentric Audit Committee and is reviewed annually.
The Charter defines the purpose, authority and responsibilities of the function.
|
|
The Head of Internal Audit reports at each Audit Committee meeting and has a direct reporting line to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Internal Audit Function operates independently of executive management and the Head of Internal Audit is responsible for coordinating Internal Audit activities. For administrative purposes the Head of Internal Audit also reports to the Head of LGRC. The Internal Audit
Function complies with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. |
|
On an annual basis, Internal Audit conducts a formal risk assessment of the entire business from which a comprehensive risk-based audit plan is derived. The assessment and audit plan are validated by executive management and approved by the AfroCentric Audit Committee. High risk businesses and processes are audited at least once annually, with other areas covered at regular intervals based on their risk profile. There is an ongoing focus on auditing technology risks given AfroCentric’s dependence on IT systems. Internal Audit also liaises with the external auditor and other assurance providers to enhance efficiencies in terms of combined assurance. The annual plan is reviewed at least once every quarter to ensure it remains relevant and responsive to key emerging risks, given changes in the operating environment. The Audit Committee approves any changes to the plan. |
|
Internal Audit proactively reviews its practices and resources for adequacy and appropriateness, to meet the increasingly demanding corporate governance and regulatory environment including the requirements of King III in South Africa. The audit team comprises well-qualified, experienced staff to ensure that the function has the competence to match AfroCentric’s diverse requirements. Where specific specialist skills or additional resources are required, these are obtained from third parties. Internal audit resources are subject to review by the AfroCentric Audit Committee. |
|
In accordance with our core values, AfroCentric Internal Audit endeavours to comply with the highest professional standards of integrity, sound practice and transparency in order to build trust and maintain the interests of client schemes and shareholders at the forefront of our corporate agenda. |
Information security and governance
Information Security (“Infosec”) Governance, Risk and
Compliance (“GRC”) management
Within the ACT Group, the AHL Information Security Policy
regulates the governance of all our clients’ information which
is supported by the AHL Enterprise Risk Management Policy
and Framework which deals with risks and opportunities
affecting value creation or preservation and is defined
as follows with reference to COSO (“the Committee of
Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission”):
“Enterprise Risk Management is a process, effected by an
entity’s board of directors, management and personnel,
applied in strategy setting and across the operations of
the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that
may affect the entity, and manage risk to be within its risk
appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
achievement of entity objectives.”
The Group’s IT subsidiary, Helios IT Solutions, follows a three
tier risk-based approach as depicted in the diagram below
to ensure that Information Security is properly governed and
aligned to support business requirements for IT governance,
risk management, service delivery and compliance.
Strategic level: Sufficient direction at a strategic level to
reduce the likelihood and impact of harm caused to the
business as a result of a loss of confidentiality, integrity or
availability of information.
Management level: IT Risk Management is an interactive and
collaborative process which contributes to the improvement
of IT security controls across the AfroCentric Group.
Technical level: Implementation and maintenance of IT
operational and technical security controls that are required
to protect the IT infrastructure and the information residing
on information assets throughout the life cycle of an IT
system and/or application to manage any possible risks.
The responsibility for the assurance of the effectiveness of
the controls in place to govern the security of information
within the AHL Group exists within the portfolios of the Audit
Committee and the Risk Committee portfolios.
|